
Playing in the small discovery screen and making its UK premiere was director Agnieszka Wojtowicz-Vosloo’s After.Life, asking the question: where is the line between life and death?
After an argument with her boyfriend (Justin Long), Anna (Christina Ricci) drives away angry, tears blurring her vision and not paying attention to the road. A shriek later, Anna wakes up to find Eliot Deacon (Liam Neeson), the local funeral director, preparing her body for burial. Naturally Anna doesn’t believe she’s dead and the audience is left to decide for itself. Deacon claims he can communicate with the dead but even Anna’s boyfriend Paul suspects Deacon isn’t what he appears to be.
What’s confusing about this film is the amount of unanswered questions. The audience is introduced to Anna, a depressed school teacher who seems to be losing interest in her boyfriend. While in the shower her nose bleeds: Why? Who knows. When leaving school the lights go out in the otherwise deserted corridor behind her: Why? No idea. Does she really die in the car accident? You’ll have to make up your own mind.

Moving onto Deacon, the lonely funeral director who claims to be able to talk to the deceased: he does appear to have inside knowledge of the dead people he buries, illustrated by his knowledge of one person’s favourite flower. But when Paul tries to get help from the police, they mention a chemical that can slow down the breathing and heart rate and create the appearance of death. Cut to the next scene and Deacon is injecting Anna with the same stuff. What is it that Anna sees in the fogged-up mirror that causes her to exclaim that Deacon had lied to her?
There is a lack of rules for the dead which also suggests they aren’t actually dead. If Anna is dead, how can she touch and move objects, even going so far as to trash Deacon’s equipment. How can she breathe; misting a mirror when she looks at her reflection? How can she cry if her blood no longer circulates and her body is already decomposing? If Deacon is the only one to see Anna as she truly is, why did Paul hear her when she managed to phone him? And why, oh why will Deacon not let Paul see Anna’s dead body?
Coming out of After.Life, we’re still asking, where is the line between life and death?

More on IndieMovies:
Read the latest movie news and movie reviews. Keep up-to-date with the latest from the Venice Film Festival 2010. Watch free movies on the site now.

Alternatively paste the code below into your blog or website to create a link to this article:
You can also use the buttons below to promote this page using Twitter or Facebook:



What is it that Anna sees in the fogged-up mirror that causes her to exclaim that Deacon had lied to her? Umm. Her breathe?! This film is actually pretty amazing. It poses a lot of questions but if you follow it carefully (hint to reviewer?) you'll get all the answers. Intelligent and very chilling. If you like edgy and very dark you'll love this movie.
Thanks for your comment Tootsy. I think you'll find the fact that Anna can breathe was explained away pretty early on in the film. Perhaps I'd seen too many slashers that weekend to truly appreciate this film.
Rather enjoyed this movie. Made me think and was beautifully acted. Personally I wasn't that confused and thought the director handled the "is she isn't she" superbly. The whole point was to have the audience think she's dead one minute then turn it on its head the next. He took risks, but frankly I wish more directors took risks like this.
I agree turner77, during the film, the "is she, isn't she" was great. Personally (and not trying to give too much away), I would have preferred a more conclusive ending.